authorityresearch.com

The Communism In You,
In Your Heart,
just waiting, through dialogue, i.e., with affirmation from others to be 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority.
The Communism in you, i.e., "the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life." What you have in common with "the world."

by
Dean Gotcher

"The heart is deceitful above all things [thinking pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., having to set aside your carnal desires of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth], and desperately wicked [hating the father's/Father's authority that "gets in the way," i.e. that prevents, i.e., inhibits or blocks you from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates]: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9

You can not see your hate of restraint as being evil, i.e., "wicked" ("desperately wicked") because your love of pleasure, i.e., "lust," i.e., "self interest" (getting in the way) blinds you to it. Like a drug, pleasure (dopamine emancipation), i.e., "self interest," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., that which the world stimulates blinds you to your hatred toward restraint, i.e., hatred toward the father's/Father's authority, i.e., blinds you to your "wickedness" which is being expressed toward those who are preventing (or trying to prevent) you from having access to the drug, i.e., to pleasure (dopamine emancipation) when you are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning—making you not just wicked but "desperately wicked" in your effort to attain, keep, or get it, i.e., pleasure, i.e., "lust" back. Communism (common-ism), i.e., "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life" ("self esteem") always sounds ("feels") "good," i.e., 'reasonable' to the youth—who then become vicious when they can not have their way, i.e., when the father/Father and his/His authority, i.e., doing right and not wrong according his/His established commands, rules, facts, and truth get in the way.

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

The father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established, i.e., "Because I said so," "It is written" commands, rules, facts, and truth is what communism must negate in order (as in "new" world order) for you to become your "self," i.e. to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates without having a guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting," i.e., for being "human," i.e., for being "of the world"), so you (now a communist, i.e., a "common-ist") can be your "self," i.e., do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity (with affirmation, i.e., with "the group's," i.e., "the people's" approval).

"For whosoever shall do the will of my Father which is in heaven, the same is my brother, and sister, and mother." Matthew 12:50

The gospel message is all about the Father, i.e., about the Son's obedience to His Heavenly Father in all things commanded, calling you—'redeemed' by His shed blood on the cross, with His righteousness imputed to you for believing, i.e., for having faith in Him, being 'reconciled' to the Father in the Father's resurrection of His Son from the grave—to deny your "self," i.e., your carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment' which the world is stimulating, pick up your cross (accept the rejection of others because you refuse to affirm them, i.e., their "lusts"), and following after the Son, Jesus Christ, do the same, i.e., do the Father's will.

"And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him: For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. Furthermore we have had fathers of our flesh which corrected us, and we gave them reverence: shall we not much rather be in subjection unto the Father of spirits, and live? For they verily for a few days chastened us after their own pleasure; but he for our profit, that we might be partakers of his holiness. Now no chastening for the present seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which are exercised thereby." Hebrews 12:5-11

"Then answered Jesus and said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, The Son can do nothing of himself, but what he seeth the Father do: for what things soever he doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise." "I can of mine own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not mine own will, but the will of the Father which hath sent me." "For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak." John 5:19, 30; 12:47-50

"Love not the world, neither the things that are in the world. If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him. 1 John 2:15

"Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." John 14:6

"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9

While the Lord divides the father from the son and the son from the father, etc., with the son and/or the father placing their faith in the Lord first and foremost, he did not negate the father's authority itself (the Fourth Commandment, i.e., honoring your father and mother which precedes, i.e., is foundational to all the following secular commandments), only establishing His Heavenly Father's authority above all authority in your thoughts and in your actions.

"Casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalteth itself against the knowledge of God, and bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ;" 2 Corinthians 10:5

Communism negates the father's/Father's authority system itself, making pleasure, i.e., "lust," i.e., "human nature," i.e., the child's carnal nature the standard, i.e., the 'drive' of and the 'purpose' for life. Immanuel Kant's "lawfulness without law" is mankind, "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates, doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting" without having a guilty conscience. (Immanuel Kant, Critique of Judgment) Instead of man being 'reconciled' to the Father, through faith in his Son, i.e., his Son's obedience to the Father, with man placing his faith in the Father, and in his Son Jesus Christ, common-ism places man's "faith" (which is actually sight) in his "self," i.e., in his "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates, 'reconciling his "self" to the world.

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right')

In other words: "Lust reconciles you to the world." According to Karl Marx, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning,' i.e., 'reasoning' from your carnal desires, i.e., your "self interests," i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment' which the world stimulates (which always "seems to be" practical, i.e., rational, i.e., reasonable in your eyes—what you have in common with all mankind), it is in your "lust" for pleasure, i.e., for the things of the world, which includes the approval, i.e., the affirmation of men that you find common ground with those "of the world." According to Karl Marx, i.e., Marxism, i.e., Communism (global socialism), until your "self" is 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority, i.e., from restraint, i.e., until you are 'liberated' from having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, i.e., in order to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., until you are 'liberated' from having a guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders) for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting" you can not become at one with the world in pleasure, i.e., you can not become "actualized," i.e., "self actualized."

"Laws must not fetter human life; but yield to it; they must change as the needs and capacities of the people change." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right)

"In the eyes of the dialectic philosophy, nothing is established for all times, nothing is absolute or sacred." (Karl Marx)

According to Karl Marx, i.e., Communism laws must not be ridged, i.e., not established "for all times and places," i.e., not external to a person's carnal nature, i.e., not objective, i.e., not "repressing" "human nature," "alienating" the person from his "self" and from the rest of the world, i.e., from other's who have the same carnal nature, i.e., "lusts," but must be subjective, i.e., subject to the "sensuous needs" and "sense perception" of the person, i.e., of those in power, i.e., "If I feel this way, i.e., loving pleasure and hating restraint, everyone one else should feel this way as well." According to this way of 'reasoning,' i.e., 'reasoning' from your carnal nature, i.e., your "felt needs" ("lusts") of the 'moment,' which the world (the situation) is stimulating, your life, i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment' take on the living personification of "the people," i.e., "the people's" "lusts"—your "feelings" become "the peoples feelings," your "thoughts" become "the peoples thoughts," i.e., universal, making anyone who gets in the way of your "feelings," i.e., "the peoples feelings," i.e., your carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment,' i.e., "the peoples" carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment' (which the world is stimulates) a resister of 'change,' i.e., an enemy of "the people." As participant's "self interests" change in the consensus meetings ('change' taking place as they add to their carnal desires of the 'moment'—what they originally came to the meeting to protect—their desire for "the groups" approval, stimulated by their fear of "the groups" rejection if they get in "the groups" way) the laws they make 'change' in accordance to their "felt needs," i.e., their "self interests," i.e., their "lusts" of the 'moment,' perceived as the needs of "the people," i.e., "the group"—as "self think" becomes "group think," "group think" becomes "self think," i.e., both become one as the person's "feelings," i.e., carnal desires, i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' become "the groups" "feelings," i.e., carnal desires, i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' and "the groups" "feelings," i.e., carnal desires, i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' become the person's "feelings," i.e., carnal desires, i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment.'

"The guilty conscience is formed in childhood by the incorporation of the parents and the wish to be father of oneself." "What we call 'conscience' perpetuates inside of us our bondage to past objects now part of ourselves:" (Brown, Life Against Death)

"The personal conscience is the key element in ensuring self-control, refraining from deviant behavior even when it can be easily perpetrated." "The family, the next most important unit affecting social control, is obviously instrumental in the initial formation of the conscience and in the continued reinforcement of the values that encourage law abiding behavior." (Dr. Robert Trojanowicz, The meaning of "Community" in Community Policing)

"The negative valence of a forbidden object which in itself attracts the child thus usually derives from an induced field of force of an adult." "If this field of force loses its psychological existence for the child (e.g., if the adult goes away or loses his authority) the negative valence also disappears." (Kurt Lewin; A Dynamic Theory of Personality)

By removing the father's/Father's authority in establishing policy, i.e., in making laws the guilty conscience, i.e., the "negative valance" (which the father's/Father's authority engenders) for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting" is negated, so those who are making law, i.e., establishing policy can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity, i.e., with "the groups," i.e., "the peoples" approval aka affirmation. Contracts are therefore always "readily adaptable to 'change,'" based upon the "feeling," i.e., the "self interests," i.e., the "lusts" of those establishing policy for "the people" at the time—making laws always subject to the "feelings," i.e., the "self interests," i.e., the "lusts" of those establishing policy in the meeting (which is being manipulate by the person or persons facilitating the meeting, making sure the laws or policies "the group" establishe for the day satisfy his or their carnal desires, i.e., "self interests," i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment'). As the child is not in love with the toy but rather in the pleasure (dopamine emancipation) that the toy stimulates in him, the leader is not in love with you, i.e., "the people," but rather in the pleasure (dopamine emancipation) that you, i.e., "the people" stimulate in him. As there is no "love of the Father" in the child's "lust" for the things of the world, there is no mercy and grace (compassion) for you, i.e., for "the citizens" in the leaders "lust" for the things of the world, removing you, i.e., "the citizens" (tossing you, i.e., "the citizens" aside as an unwanted toy) when you, i.e., "the citizens" get in the way of or no longer give him, i.e., "the people" pleasure, i.e., no longer serve his, i.e., "the people's" 'purpose.' By recognizing (acknowledging) the father's/Father's authority he remains guilty of "lust." By rejecting (no longer acknowledging) the father's/Father's authority he is 'liberated' from any guilt for "lust"—no longer having any guilt (interest) in what happens to you, i.e., to "the citizens" if/when you, i.e., they get in his, i.e., "the peoples" way.

"The life which he has given to the object sets itself against him as an alien and hostile force." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3)

By adhering to established commands, rules, facts, and truth, accepting them as is, by faith and obeying them, i.e., doing the father's/Father's will, according to Communism, i.e., Karl Marx the person establishes "an alien and hostile force" over and therefore against his carnal nature. If, according to Karl Marx, the father's/Father's authority is created by men, it can be negated by men as well, providing he is give the "right" conditions, i.e., "environment," i.e., "circumstances" to do it in.

"Concerning the changing of circumstances by men, the educator must himself be educated." (Karl Marx, Thesis on Feuerbach # 3)

The only way he can be 'liberated' from this "alien and hostile force," i.e., become his "self" again is to reject the father's/Father's authority outright, i.e., to question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack it, 'liberating' his "self" (and others) from its affect on his (and their) life. Education, i.e., "the educator" plays a key role in this 'change' of a persons way of thinking and acting, i.e., paradigm., 'liberating' his "self" from the father's/Father's authority, i.e., from "an alien and hostile force" that gets in "lust's" way.

"[W]e recognize the point of view that truth and knowledge are only relative and that there are no hard and fast truths which exist for all time and places." "Educational procedures are intended to develop the more desirable rather than the more customary types of behavior." (Benjamin Bloom, et al., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Book 1: Cognitive Domain)

Who defines "desirable?" i.e., the parent aka the citizen or the "educator?" "Customary types of behavior" are cognitive driven, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control your "self," i.e., your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which the world is stimulating in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts. and truth. "More desirable types of behavior" according to Benjamin Bloom, are driven by the child's "affective domain," i.e., the child's carnal desires of the 'moment' which the world is stimulating, making the child's carnal nature, i.e., the child's "lust" for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world (the situation, i.e., the classroom environment) is stimulating the pathway to knowing the "truth," i.e., to becoming his "self."

"The affective domain is, in retrospect, a virtual 'Pandora's Box' [a "box" full of evils, which once opened, can not be closed].' It is in this 'box' that the most influential [manipulative] controls are to be found." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)

"In fact, a large part of what we call "good teaching" is the teacher's ability to attain affective objectives ['liberating' the children from their parent's authority] through challenging the student's fixed beliefs ["challenging" their parent's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, which they already resent/resist] and getting them to discuss issues [according to their carnal desires, i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' which the world, i.e., the classroom environment is stimulating, which the educator is "manipulating," i.e., their participation (being "positive") results in group approval, their refusal to participate, i.e., their adhering to their parent's authority, i.e., to established commands, rules, facts, and truth (being "negative") results in group rejection, that is, their desire for group approval and fear of group rejection now directs their steps, i.e., their way they "feeling," thinking, and acting toward their "self," others, and the world as well as how they respond to authority]." (ibid.)

"…there is no more important issue than the interrelationship of the group members." "To question the value or activities of the group, would be to thrust himself into a state of dissonance [where the person is caught between his carnal desires ("feelings," i.e., "self interests," i.e., "lusts") of the 'moment' and his belief (established commands, rules, facts, and truth)]." (Irvin D. Yalom, The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy)

"Few individuals, as Asch has shown, can maintain their objectivity [their belief, i.e., their faith in authority, be it in their parent's and/or God's authority] in the face of apparent group unanimity." ibid.

All "educators" are certified and schools accredited today based upon their use of what are called "Blooms' Taxonomies," curriculum used in the classroom, incorporating, through dialogue, "the deviant student's" ideology (Marxism) into the classroom, in the name of "tolerance." If you tolerate wrong, i.e., "lust," "lust" becomes right, i.e., the "norm," making right, i.e., the father's/Father's authority wrong. Some might say "Marx was more right than wrong." but the truth is he was as the demotion expert, whose tomb stone read "He was more right than wrong," dead wrong

"The individual may have 'secret' thoughts ["lusts"] which he will under no circumstances reveal to anyone else if he can help it [out of fear of being judged, rejected, and/or punished]. To gain access [through getting him to dialogue, i.e., to share his "feelings," i.e., his desires and dissatisfactions of the 'moment' with others] is particularly important, for here may lie the individual's potential [for 'change,' i.e., to become of and for his "self" and the world only—'liberating' his "self" from the father's/Father's authority]." (Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality)

"It is not individualism [the child having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline his "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth, having to stand alone against "the group" when they are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting"] that fulfills the individual, on the contrary it destroys him [makes him "neurotic"—caught between doing the father's/Father's will and doing his own will instead, when his will, i.e., his carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment,' and his father's/Father's will, i.e., doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth are in conflict with one another, called "belief-action dichotomy"]. Society ["human relationship based upon self interest," i.e., "building relationship" with others based upon the child's carnal desires, i.e., his "self interest," i.e., his "lusts," i.e., finding his identity, i.e., "self" in the other, i.e., in "the group," i.e., in society (with the same "lusts"] is the necessary framework through which freedom [from the father's/Father's authority] and individuality [to be "of and for self" and the world only] are made realities." (Karl Marx, in John Lewis, The Life and Teachings of Karl Marx)

What you have in common with those "of the world" (the basis of common-ism) is "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., only that which is "of the world," what Karl Marx called "sensuous needs," "sense perception," and "sense experience," i.e., "only that which is of Nature." It is in dialogue you make known to others your carnal desires, i.e., your "lusts," i.e., your "self interests" of the 'moment' which the world is stimulating. (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3) You discuss right and wrong. You dialogue your likes and dislikes. When you dialogue right and wrong, you make your 'likes' right and anything or anyone you dislike wrong, making right and wrong subjective, i.e., subject to your opinion, i.e., your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires, i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment,' that the world is stimulating.

"A dialogue is essentially a conversation between equals." "The spirit of dialogue, is in short, the ability to hold many points of view in suspension, along with a primary interest in the creation of common meaning." (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity)

When it comes to right and wrong, it is in your dialogue with your "self" and with others you 'justify' your "self," i.e., your "self interests," i.e., your "lusts," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' that the world stimulates—'liberating' your "self" from the father's/Father's authority. There is no father's/Father's authority, i.e., "Because I said so," "It is written" in dialogue. There is only your "self," i.e., your "self interests," i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world (the situation) is stimulating.

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

Unlike in a discussion, where "people usually hold relatively fixed positions and argue in favour of their views as they try to convince others to change," i.e., where you must suspend, as upon a cross, your carnal desires, i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment' which the world is stimulating in order to hear and receive the truth, in dialogue you must suspend, as upon a cross any established command, rule, fact or truth that inhibits or blocks dialogue, i.e., that prevents you and the other person from sharing each others common carnal desires, i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' which the world is stimulating—without fear of being judged, condemned, and/or cast out, i.e., being held accountable for your and the other persons thoughts and actions.. (Bohm and Peat, Science, Order, and Creativity)

"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory)

"Bypassing the traditional channels of top-down decision making, our objective centers upon transforming public opinion into an effective instrument of global politics." "Individual values must be measured by their contribution to common interests and ultimately to world interests transforming public consensus into one favorable to the emergence of a stable and humanistic world order." "Consensus is both a personal and a political step. It is a precondition of all future steps." (Ervin Laszlo, A Strategy for the Future: The Systems Approach to World Order)

"The real nature of man is the totality of social relations." (Karl Marx, Thesis on Feuerbach #6)

"Self-perfection of the human individual is fulfilled in union with the world in pleasure." (Norman O. Brown, Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History)

"Once the earthly family [with children having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according to the father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth] is discovered to be the secret of the Holy family [with the Son humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining his "self" in order to do the Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according to the Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth], the former [the earthly father's authority, i.e., the system itself with children having to trust in (have faith in) and obey the father (their parents), their teacher, the laws of the land, etc.,] must then itself be destroyed [vernichtet, i.e., annihilated, i.e., negated] in theory and in practice [in the children's thoughts as well as in their actions—resulting in children no longer "fellowshipping" with one another based upon the father's/Father's (their parents/God's) commands, rules, facts, and truth but, through dialogue, "building relationship" with one another based upon their carnal nature, i.e., their carnal desires, i.e., their "self interests," i.e., their "lusts" of the 'moment,' 'creating' a "new" world order of "lawfulness without law," i.e., "lawlessness" where the child's carnal nature rules without parental restraint]." (Karl Marx, Feuerbach Thesis #4)

"The family is one of these social forms which ... cannot be changed without change in the total social framework." (Max Horkheimer, Kritische Theori)

By 'shifting' the focus of education away from the father's/Father's authority, i.e., away from doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth to the child's "affective domain," i.e., "feelings," i.e., carnal desires, i.e., "lusts," i.e., "self interests" of the moment that the world (the situation, i.e., the classroom environment) is stimulating the father's/Father's authority is negated not only in the child's thoughts and actions but in the family (society) as well.

"The child, contrary to appearance, is the absolute, the rationality of the relationship; he is what is enduring and everlasting, the totality which produces itself once again as such [once he is 'liberated' from the father'/Father's authority to become as he was before the father's/Father's first command, rule, fact, or truth came into his life (separating him from his "self" and the world), of (and now for) "self" and the world only]." (Georg Hegel, System of Ethical Life)

"Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual comes to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)

Communism, i.e., common-ism is based upon the carnal nature of the child. With the "help" of the therapist, i.e., the "vanguard party," i.e., the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., through the use of dialogue (there is no father's/Father's authority in dialogue, there is only the child's carnal desires, i.e., "self interests," i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world is stimulating) the child is 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority, negating the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience that the father's/Father's authority engenders so he, along with all "the people," including the therapist, i.e., the "vanguard party," i.e., the facilitator of 'change' can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity, i.e., with "the groups" approval, i.e., with affirmation—killing the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, the righteous and anyone else who gets in the way (of pleasure) without having a guilty conscience. Without negating the father's/Father's authority, thereby negating the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting," "self" can not become "actualized."

"Authoritarian submission [humbling, denying, dying to, controlling, disciplining ('capitulating') "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will] was conceived of as a very general attitude that would be evoked in relation to a variety of authority figures—parents, older people, leaders, supernatural power, and so forth." "God is conceived more directly after a parental image and thus as a source of support and as a guiding and sometimes punishing authority." "Submission to authority, desire for a strong leader, subservience of the individual to the state [parental authority, local control, Nationalism], and so forth, have so frequently and, as it seems to us, correctly, been set forth as important aspects of the Nazi creed that a search for correlates of prejudice had naturally to take these attitudes into account [why all who defend the father's/Father's authority are 'labeled' fascist, racist, etc. today]." "The power-relationship between the parents, the domination of the subject's family by the father or by the mother, and their relative dominance in specific areas of life also seemed of importance for our problem [how to 'liberate' children from parental authority, man from God's authority, mankind from Nationalism aka Fascism, etc., so they can be their "self," i.e., "actualize" their "self," no longer seeing their "self" as being subject to a higher authority other then to their carnal desires, i.e., "self interests," i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' and anyone 'justifying' them]." (Theodor Adorno, The Authoritarian Personality)

Communist education—negating the father's/Father's authority in the classroom:

"There are many stories of the conflict and tension that these new practices are producing between parents and children." (David Krathwohl, Benjamin S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Affective Domain)

All "educators" are certified and schools accredited today based upon their use of what are called "Blooms' Taxonomies" ("a psychological classification system" used "to develop attitudes and values ... which are not shaped by the parents." "Ordering" "different kinds of affective behavior," i.e., "the range of emotion(s)" "organized into value systems and philosophies of life.") in the classroom, incorporating through dialogue Marxist ideology into the classroom curriculum, 'liberating' children from the father's/Father's authority. Benjamin Bloom's "weltanschauung," i.e., world view was that of two Marxists, Theodor Adorno and Erick Fromm (Book 2: Affective Domain). One million of "Bloom's Taxonomies" were printed for the Communist Chinese education system ("educators") back in 1971. (Benjamin Bloom, Forty Year Evaluation) Any teacher questioning/challenging/removing their use in American schools (public, private, "Christian" schools; pre-school, grade school, high school, college/University, vocational, etc., school) today would put their job, i.e., their employment in jeopardy.

"To create effectively a new set of attitudes and values [paradigm], the individual must undergo great reorganization of his personal beliefs and attitudes and he must be involved in an environment which in many ways is separated from the previous environment in which he was developed." "...many of these changes are produced by association with peers who have less authoritarian points of view, as well as through the impact of a great many courses of study in which the authoritarian pattern is in some ways brought into question while more rational and nonauthoritarian behaviors are emphasized." (Book 2: Affective Domain)

"The child takes on the characteristic behavior of the group in which he is placed. . . . he reflects the behavior patterns [paradigm] which are set by the adult leader of the group." (Kurt Lewin in Wilbur Brookover, A Sociology of Education)

"Change in methods of leadership is probably the quickest way to bring about a change in the cultural atmosphere of a group." "Any real change of the culture [paradigm] of a group is, therefore, interwoven with the changes of the power constellation within the group." (Barker, Dembo, & Lewin, "frustration and regression: an experiment with young children" in Child Behavior and Development)

"We are not attempting to classify the particular subject matter or content." "What we are classifying is the intended behavior of students—the ways in which individuals are to act, think, or feel as the result of participating in some unit of instruction." "Educational procedures are intended to develop the more desirable rather than the more customary types of behavior." "[W]e recognize the point of view that truth and knowledge are only relative and that there are no hard and fast truths which exist for all time and places." (Benjamin Bloom, et al., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Book 1, Cognitive Domain)

Change in leadership style, i.e., method of education, i.e., curriculum changes a persons paradigm, i.e., how they feel, think, behave toward their "self," others, and the world, as well as how they respond toward authority. By replacing the father's/Father's authority system (in the classroom) with the students dialoguing their opinions (their "feelings", i.e., their carnal desires, i.e., their "lusts," i.e., their "self interests" of the 'moment' which the world is stimulating—which includes their desire for approval and fear of rejection by "the group") to a consensus (group affirmation), the student's paradigm is 'changed,' i.e., the father's/Father's authority system is negated, i.e., filtered out of their thoughts and actions.

"A change in the curriculum is a change in the people concerned—in teachers, in students, in parents ....." "Curriculum change means that the group involved must shift its approval from the old to some new set of reciprocal behavior patterns." "... people involved who were loyal to the older pattern [paradigm] must be helped to transfer their allegiance to the new." "Re-education aims to change the system of values and beliefs [paradigm] of an individual or a group." (Kenneth D. Benne, Human Relations in Curriculum Change)

By changing the classroom environment (curriculum) from the father's/Father's authority to the children dialoguing their opinions to a consensus, Communism, i.e., "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., Marxism has became the law of the land. The "educator" does not have to tell the students to question, challenge, defy, disregard, attack their parent's authority when they get home from school, if they were not doing that already (telling them would be "old school," maintaining the "old" world order of being told even if it was done for the 'purpose' of 'change,' i.e., for the 'purpose' of creating a "new" world order), all they have to do is use a curriculum in the classroom that "encourages," i.e., pressures the students to participate in the process of 'change,' i.e., into dialoguing their opinions to a consensus, 'justifying' their carnal nature over and therefore against their parents authority. Being told to be "positive" (supportive of the other students carnal nature) and not "negative" (judging them by their parents standards) pressures students to 'justify' their and the other students love of pleasure and hate of restrain, doing so in order to be approved, i.e., affirmed by "the group," resulting in "the group" labeling those students who, holding onto their parents standards, i.e., refusing to participate in the process of 'change' or fighting against it as being "negative," divisive, hateful, intolerant, maladjusted, unadaptable to 'change,' resisters of 'change,' not "team players," lower order thinkers, in denial, phobic, prejudiced, judgmental, racist, fascist, dictators, anti-social, etc., i.e., "hurting" peoples "feelings" resulting in "the group" rejecting them—the student's natural desire for approval and fear of rejection forces him to participate

"Third-Force psychology is also epi-Marxian in these senses, i.e., including the most basic scheme as true-good social conditions [an environment void of the father's/Father's authority where children can "actualize" their "self" without fear of judgment or condemnation] are necessary for personal growth, bad social conditions [where children have to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline their "self" in order to do the father's/Father's aka their parents will] stunt human nature,... This is to say, one could reinterpret Marx into a self-actualization-fostering Third- and Fourth-Force psychology-philosophy. And my impression is anyway that this is the direction in which they are going now." "The whole discussion becomes species-wide, One World." "This is a realistic combination of the Marxian version & the Humanistic. (Better add to definition of "humanistic" that it also means one species, One World.)" (Abraham Maslow, The Journals of Abraham Maslow)

"Self-actualizing people have to a large extent transcended the values of their culture [their parent's/God's authority aka the father's/Father's authority]. They are not so much merely Americans as they are world citizens, members of the human species first and foremost." (Maslow, Farther Reaches)

"I have found whenever I ran across authoritarian students that the best thing for me to do was to break their backs immediately." "The correct thing to do with authoritarians is to take them realistically for the bastards they are and then behave toward them as if they were bastards." (Abraham Maslow, Maslow on Management)

"... the attack on antieroticism, the Christian & Jewish foundations" ... "is absolutely right.." (Maslow, Journals)

As two "children" in the garden in Eden (with the "help" of the master facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the master psychotherapist) were 'liberated' from the "Father's" authority, so to today the same method is being put into praxis, i.e., being applied on a global scale. Some people think that the "Berlin Wall" came down because Communism was defeated. The truth is it came down because Communism had succeeded. Instead of shooting the fathers outright (leaving the guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting" in tact), by getting the children to dialogue their opinions to a consensus in "the group" meeting, the father's/Father's authority is negated in their thoughts and in their actions, negating their having a guilty conscience for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting" in the process. Communism is in you. In your heart, just waiting (with the "help" of a facilitator of 'change,' i.e., a psychotherapist) to be 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience which the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e. for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' which the world stimulates so you (and the rest of the world, including the facilitator of 'change,' i.e., the psychotherapist—with your affirmation) can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"To experience Freud is to partake a second time of the forbidden fruit;" (Brown, Life Against Death)

"If the guilt accumulated in the civilized domination of man by man can ever be redeemed by freedom, then the 'original sin' must be committed again: 'We must again eat from the tree of knowledge in order to fall back into the state of innocence.'" Herbert Marcuse, Eros and Civilization: a psychological inquiry into Freud)

The 'liberation' of your, your spouse's, your children's, your parent's, your neighbor's, your educator's, your boss's, your leader's, your legislator's, you judge's, your minister's heart from the father's/Father's authority (through the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus) is how Communism, i.e., "the lust of the flesh," "the lust of the eyes," and "the pride of life," i.e., "self" 'justification' before men (negating the guilty conscience which the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., "lusting") has succeeded in taking over this nation and the world. There really is nothing new under the sun. What began in the garden in Eden, i.e., "self" 'justification' is now the law of the land.

"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12

© Institution for Authority Research, Dean Gotcher 2020